The Losers

The Losers is an explosive film filled with explosions (of course), hand-to-hand combat, gun battles, espionage and humor.  It’s based on the comic book from DC’s Vertigo Comics, of which I was completely unaware, until I saw the opening credits.  I must confess that I haven’t read the comic book so my commentary is solely based on the film alone.  I seem to be on a roll watching movies based on comic books (unintentionally).  It stars Jeffrey Dean Morgan (the Winchester brother’s Dad from Supernatural) as Clay. He’s in charge of an elite Special Forces military group who become fugitives after one of their Ops in Bolivia goes horribly wrong--resulting in the deaths of 25 children.

The Special Forces team is of comprised of a group of men with various military specialties and also features Chris Evans (Push, Fantastic Four) as Jensen, Idris Elba (The Wire, Daddy’s Little Girls) as Roque, Columbus Short (Armored, Stomp The Yard) as Pooch/”Legless” Pooch, and Oscar Jaenada as Cougar.  Zoe Saldana (Star Trek) also stars as the smoking-hot, and mysterious Aisha who agrees to bank roll their operations if they agree to kill Max (Jason Patric) the evil genius responsible for their exile.  

As far as villains go, Max is an affable yet eccentric character who wears one glove over a disfigured left hand.  He has a penchant for killing; which he demonstrates when he shoots his female assistant in the head for merely letting an umbrella, she was holding to shield him from the sun, get away from her for the briefest of seconds. 

Clay has a weakness for bad women.  Case in point: how many guys do you know can pick up a girl at a bar, take her back to his hotel and end up having the hotel burned to the ground? 

I told myself I was not under any circumstances going to watch the A-Team movie that was also released this year.  The TV series was a classic, and it pains me to see different actors mimicking the original actors that played the characters. Remakes of classic popular TV shows are rarely about actors interpreting who the characters (like Hannibal, BA, or Face) really are and making them come alive or putting a fresh spin on them through the actor’s own talents. It’s usually about how good an impression of George Peppard, Mr. T, or Dirk Benedict the actor can do.  That aside, The Losers is so reminiscent of the A-Team that I’m going to have to watch it just to compare the two.  So stay tuned for a future blog. 

**SPOILER ALERT**  If you’ve read any of my earlier blogs, you’ll know the answer to this question: why is this black man in the film?

Although The Losers is decent and the characters are very likeable, it is typical to the action-adventure genre and doesn’t do much to set itself apart from any other movie.  But it’s certainly enjoyable and shouldn’t be overlooked as a DVD rental.  For the film’s strict adherence to the action-adventure formula and lack of innovative twists, I’d give it 3 fingers out of 5.

Batman: Under the Red Hood

This is one of the best animated movies from DC Comics that has come along in quite a while.  It’s straight to DVD so you won’t see it at the theatre. It’s dark, gritty, action-packed and really aimed at a more mature audience.  It takes place in the time-line where the original Robin has grown up and left the “nest” to become a crime-fighter called Nightwing.  This movie treats us to a brief reunion of Batman and the original Robin/Nightwing. If you don’t know the Batman mythos after Robin left, Batman later took in a wayward boy named Jason Todd, and trained him to become the next Robin.   And if you followed the comic books, you know that partnership ended with finality thanks to the Joker. 

The wonderful thing about animated movies is they stay true to the source material and don’t add those “creative” (and I use that word loosely) Hollywood-isms that more often than not, ruin the story.   For me watching Batman: Under The Red Hood was like taking a trip down memory lane.  The movie freely used code names such as Nightwing and Amazo.  We are even witness to the restorative abilities of the “Lazarus Pit”.  I’m sorry, I’m just a sucker for code names, and it really bothers me when they’re ignored or used in awkward ways—usually as the punch line of a joke in live-action movies. 

The voice acting was superb.  Casting Jensen Ackles from Supernatural as The Red Hood was brilliant. He’s got the whole angst-ridden self-righteous routine down pat.  I’m sure he was channeling the character of Dean Winchester he plays on Supernatural all the while.  Batman nemesis Ra's al Ghul (Jason Isaacs) is also in the movie along with his daughter Talia who makes the briefest of cameo appearances.  A departure from the normal actors that usually fill these roles, Bruce Greenwood did an excellent job of voice-acting as The Batman and John Di Maggio was the voice of the Joker. 

With all due respect to the late Heath Ledger who portrayed the Joker in the last Batman live-action movie (Batman: The Dark Knight), the Joker in this movie was way better.  Somehow the Hollywood version  missed the boat completely and gave us a Joker that was just sick and twisted without any of the comedy the Joker is known for.  They tried, but most attempts didn’t come off as funny.  The Joker in this animated version was spot on.  Yes, he was sick and twisted, but he was funny.  He cracked jokes and made the most inappropriate quips. He made me laugh, although uncomfortably at times.  He also murdered half a dozen people and joked about it. This is who the Joker is supposed to be.  And that haunting laugh was icing on the cake.

The arch villain (and there are quite a few) is the Red Hood. He becomes the next crime lord of Gotham City and Batman’s most ruthless enemy.  He kills without hesitation. The Red Hood can counter all of Batman’s abilities and tricks making him the toughest adversary Batman has ever faced. I’m not going to reveal who is under the Red Hood, but I have to confess that I figured it out before Batman, and he’s supposed to be the world’s greatest detective.  Obvious clues aside, I definitely recommend you watch this DVD and see if you can figure out who is under the Red Hood. Because it is so faithful to the comic book and filled with so much action, I have to give it 5 out of 5 fingers.

Exclusive Report--iPhone 4 Antenna Cover-Up Exposed

Well, I finally bit the bullet over the weekend and upgraded my iPhone 3Gs to iOS 4.2 and in doing so discovered an insidious cover-up by Apple Inc.

Apple was handed a major setback when Consumer Reports announced that it can’t recommend iPhone 4 due to its widely publicized reception problems. Users discovered that the reception problems were caused by a defective outer antenna design that wraps around the edge of the iPhone 4. When making contact with the antenna with your hand (as you normally would when making a call) reception degrades and calls drop.  Apple refused to acknowledge that the antenna was to blame.

Apple came back with a claim that reception issues were caused by false signal strength being reported on iPhones.  According to them, the algorithm that calculates cell phone signal strength is incorrect, falsely showing two more bars of signal than what is actually being received. So Apple altered the algorithm in a software update so that iPhones would now report "true" signal strength.

 
Consumer Reports questioned Apple’s claim that the problem is due to incorrect display of signal strength. They doubted the problem could be fixed with an iPhone software update. It added that "AT&T Inc, the exclusive mobile phone carrier for the iPhone 4, and whose network is often blamed for reception problems, was not necessarily the main culprit".

Ok, so after my upgrade to iOS 4.2, I can confirm what Consumer Reports is saying is true.  My iPhone 3Gs is now showing three bars of signal strength, two bars less than I normally get at home.  I find it curious that I’ve been with AT&T since they were called Bellsouth Mobility and then later Cingular, that I’ve always gotten five bars at home. Even with a variety of different cell phones by manufacturers including Motorola, Sony-Ericsson and Samsung.  Were the algorithms wrong on all those phones as well? Have I been going through life deceived into thinking I had five bars when all this time I only had three?
 
Apple is covering up the fact the iPhone 4 antenna design is just plain defective by making it seem like the phone isn’t getting full signal strength, and simulating weak signal reception with a software update.

 “They need to provide an actual fix — not a bumper fix — so that the product performs as it should,” said Ashok Kumar at Rodman & Renshaw. “Apple should have taken a higher road when addressing the design flaw, instead of taking the hard-line stance that they did.”

Apple has never admitted that the antenna design of the iPhone 4 is flawed. The company adamantly told users they are holding the phone wrong and agreed to give free cases to users to fix the issue. I don't know about you, but I don't like being told that I don't know how to hold a cell phone.

In this day and age it should come as no surprise that Apple has been sued by iPhone customers in at least three complaints related to antenna problems.

Apple has also not helped itself by deleting threads in its discussion forums pointing to the Consumer Reports article.

And finally to add insult to injury:  Mark Papermaster, the executive responsible for the innovative and problematic antenna design on the iPhone 4 "resigned".

But was Papermaster's hasty exit related to the antenna woes of iPhone 4?  Tell me if you've heard this before: “actions speak louder than words.” 

Some top public relations experts, believe that "Apple will be forced to do a recall of this product."

What do you think? I’d love to hear your comments.

Kick-Ass

I remember Roger Ebert categorizing this movie as “morally reprehensible” and gave it one star. The idea of a costumed 11-year old girl killing and maiming bad guys made him fearful of the possible psychological damage it could cause children under 10 who watched this movie. But for me this was a fun movie; uncomfortably hilarious in some spots, and just plain funny in others, like a black comedy that couldn’t possibly be taken seriously. It’s every comic book geek’s dream to don a mask and tights and pretend to be a superhero. But what would happen in the real world if an ordinary person with no special abilities became a superhero? The film is based on the comic book by the same name, which I must confess, I’ve never read.

The main character Dave (Aaron Johnson) is the epitome of a geeky comic book collecting teen. He asks the question at the beginning of the movie why don’t people dress up as superheroes and fight crime? And he has a good point. With the popularity of comics you’d think there would be a (mentally unbalanced) person or two that would put on a mask and cape and come up with some gadgets and weapons to give them the upper-hand over criminals.

Before too much longer we find Dave dressed in a mail-order scuba suit and cowl, work gloves, Timberland boots and carrying 2 batons ready to fight crime. Facing down two delinquents who fleeced him for lunch money at school, the newly christened Kick-Ass not only get’s his ass kicked, but stabbed and hit by a car.

After a long and arduous recovery in the hospital we learn that Dave’s bones have been reinforced with metal plates and he’s had damage to his nerve endings which makes him insensate to pain. A new improved Kick-Ass takes to the streets looking for a lost cat named Mr. Bitey (I’m sorry, but who names their cat Mr. Bitey?) but instead, sort of by accident, saves a man who is being chased by 3 gang-bangers.

Except as comic relief, Kick-Ass is actually the least interesting character in the film. With no powers or fighting skills he’s down right boring and pathetic. His alter-ego Dave, with the angst he goes through, with his friends and father, is much more interesting and funny than his costumed persona.

Fortunately the characters that really make this move shine are Big Daddy (Nicholas Cage) and the “morally reprehensible” Hit Girl (Chloe Moretz). A father-daughter crime-fighting duo. If you could imagine what the 1960s Batman and Robin would be like in these modern day troubled times, I think they would resemble these ruthless and deadly characters. Nicholas Cage shows off some acting skills as he does an Adam West impersonation in the guise of Big Daddy. The costumes also pay homage to Batman and Robin with Big Daddy’s cowl, color scheme and utility belt, and the mask that Hit Girl wears looks like a replica of Robin’s. The similarities end there. These two are the most efficient costumed assassins since the Punisher.

If you’re looking for a fun and exciting movie that will make you laugh, albeit uncomfortably in some spots, I definitely recommend Kick-Ass. This is a film that shouldn’t be taken seriously and in fairness to Roger Ebert, shouldn’t be seen by kids under the age of 10. Out of 5 fingers I give it a 3.5.

The Book Of Eli

“If you’ve seen one post-apocalyptic movie you’ve seen them all,” I would always say. Not so with The Book of Eli. With the washed out colors and bleak, dusty and barren cinematography, this film looks like other post-apocalyptic films, but carries with it a spiritual message which is subtle yet extremely powerful and profound. The film doesn’t go into any detail on what caused the apocalypse. All we’re told is that there was some kind of “flash” that destroyed life on Earth as we know it. Only those that were able to hide under ground or in other types of reinforced shelters survived.

The story centers around Eli (Denzel Washington) and his journey to carry a book across the remains of the United States on foot. He’s been traveling for 30 years presumably from the east coast to the west coast to fulfill his destiny. I don’t know about you, but 30 years seems like an extremely long time to travel across the United States, even on foot, but as we find out in the end, those 30 years are what prepared him for his ultimate purpose.

Eli is an uncanny fighter and survivalist putting his skills to use as he faces marauders and unsavory characters along the way. He is a master with any weapon, whether a bow and arrow or gun, with unerring aim. The film has some incredible fight scenes which I heard Denzel performed himself. They often end with heads and limbs being lopped off with a machete.

It’s strange that in a world where food, water and shelter are so scarce, that the one thing that’s not in short supply is sunglasses. Almost everyone has a pair. I’m sure it’s a testament to the living conditions, the “flash” depleting the ozone layer and people living under unrelenting solar radiation, but it just looks weird seeing everybody sporting sunglasses when they don’t even know where their next meal is coming from.

During the course of his mission Eli comes across a small town out west and meets his adversary Carnegie (Gary Oldman) a mob boss of sorts who finds out that the book Eli is carrying is the Bible. It is the very book he has sought for years. In spiritual terms there are no such things as “coincidences”, even though this is a little bit too convenient. It is Carnegie’s belief that the Bible can be used to control people and the words contained therein will help him take over and expand his empire.

According to Eli this is the last Bible in existence. All the others were destroyed by hopeless, faithless people after the “flash”. A “Voice” has told him he must take the book west to someplace where it is needed. Carnegie’s town is not that place.

Refusing to join Carnegie and relinquish the Bible, Eli is hunted and pursued across the desert. He is joined by a young girl he meets in town, Solara (Mila Kunis from That 70s Show) who has become touched and inspired by the words Eli has shared with her from the Bible. Up until now, the Bible protected Eli in some rather amazing ways, but after losing it in a fire fight to Carnegie, Eli is shot and wounded. Solara manages to escape from Carnegie and his men and returns to help Eli reach his final destination.

The ending of the film reveals a surprise that I won’t spoil for you. It’s subtlety like this that makes for a good film. Even though there are clues, the movie doesn’t map everything out for you as though you can’t think for yourself. The depiction of divinity, although understated up until the end, was mind-blowing when you look back over the entire film. Out of 5 fingers, I’d have to give this one a 4.